![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
AN INVESTIGATIVE NEWS SERIES ON THE STANDARDS AND PRACTICES OF THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU START WITH TRUTH |
|
V 1.1
April 2009 |
||
![]() |
||
PART SIX: LOS
ANGELES BBB -- NO CLOSURE WITH BBB
COMPLAINT PROCESS
|
|
|
THE ANATOMY OF A
COMPLAINT PART 3
Previously,
our
investigation of the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau revealed that
the means
by which a consumer submits a complaint to the BBB effects how it is
handled. Internet
submitted complaints, by far the most popular means of complaining
about a
business (80% of all complaints), are handled by the six employees in
the Web
Services Group. All other
complaints (mail, fax, phone, walk-in) which represent the remaining
20% of the
complaint total are handled by the Customer Services Group of 25
employees. Both groups are charged with matching up the complaint with the appropriate business. There are neither written nor standard operating procedures in place for either group on how to judge the severity or meaningfulness of a complaint. Nor is there much time allotted to make this judgment. (A complete breakdown of the complaint input process of the LA BBB is in part four of this series.) This lack of procedure in the complaint input process guarantees that there is great room for error in how complaints are handled, categorized and assigned to the actual business the complaint was issued against. Things don’t improve once the complaint is in the BBB system. On a nightly basis, after either the Web or Customer Services Group has processed and input the complaint into the Los Angeles BBB system, or database, automation takes over and the clock starts ticking. Assumptions rule the day. Without the use of return receipts, fax or delivery confirmations, the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau has no way of knowing whether the business that a consumer complained about ever received the complaint notification from the BBB, or even if the complaint was sent to the correct business, much less to the correct contact at that business. Frankly, the Los Angeles Better Business doesn’t much care and time continues its fourteen day countdown toward the day of reckoning. (A complete breakdown of the LA BBB complaint notification process is in part five of this series.) Next comes
the Complaint Closure process. Complaints are looked at a bit differently at the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau than perhaps you or I would look at them. The LA BBB is not concerned with whether the complaint is resolved satisfactorily in the eyes of the complaint maker. Nor is the LA BBB greatly concerned with the degree of good faith effort put into resolving the complaint. They are not even overly concerned with the validity of the complaint. And they certainly don’t care how long you were kept on hold by a company’s customer service line. As we’ll see, the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau only cares that the business answer to the BBB. The only complaints ever counted are those generated by the Better Business Bureau. That is one vital step from complaints generated by the consumer. All
complaints sent out on behalf of the consumer by the LA BBB end up in
one of
three categories:
“Unanswered complaints” seems fairly clear, but not so fast, never assume when dealing with the Los Angeles BBB. An Unanswered Complaint does not necessarily mean the company failed to contact the complaining consumer. As defined by the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau, an “Unanswered Complaint” is one a company did not respond to the LA BBB about. There are
four main reasons a company may not respond to the BBB about a
complaint:
In all cases, the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau will treat these situations the same by labeling them Unanswered Complaints and penalize the business accordingly. There are numerous judgment calls, flaws and room for error in the Los Angeles BBB complaint handling process. In fact, it is entirely possible for a complaint that was quickly resolved, to the complete satisfaction of the complaining consumer, to be counted as an Unanswered Complaint by the Los Angeles BBB. Sound
far fetched? Not as testimony from this
sworn deposition of
November 2007 shows. 1.
In approximately May of
2004, I
submitted a complaint to the Better Business Bureau of the Southland,
Inc. (“BBB”)
regarding issues I encountered {with a
company}. Shortly after I submitted
my complaint, I was contacted by {the
company} and promptly {had the issues
resolved.} I have been very pleased
with their program. 2.
Shortly after I spoke with
{the company} (I believe either in late
May or June of 2004), I advised the BBB that my complaint had been
resolved and
that I was satisfied with {the company’s}
services. 3.
Earlier this month,
November 2007, I
received a letter from an attorney for BBB. The
letter included a declaration for me to sign…I did not
sign that
declaration because it is not accurate. For
example, the declaration provided by BBB’s attorney
makes no mention
of the fact that I advised BBB that I was satisfied with {the
company’s} response and their services. Also,
the declaration states that I was
promised a refund but never received one. I
was not promised a refund. At this
point the business is screwed. The
business that has an unanswered, BBB generated complaint has no
recourse with
the Los Angeles BBB, even if the
complainant notifies the BBB that the complaint was resolved to their satisfaction. Once deemed an Unanswered Complaint by the LA BBB, it will remain so in their
database for three years. In
many cases, pointing out such circumstances
to the Los Angeles BBB only gets the business’s BBB Letter Grade
lowered
further. It pretty much takes divine
intervention to make the LA BBB change a complaint’s closure status
once it’s
in the system, especially if the complaint is against a non-member
business. That, or in the case of it
being the first
such complaint, humbling oneself and immediately joining the Los
Angeles Better
Business has been seen to work in getting Unanswered Complaints removed. “Unresolved Complaints” are a bit trickier to define. In BBB lingo, an Unresolved Complaint is one in which the complaining party (the consumer) is not satisfied with the company’s response or resolution efforts, and the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau agrees with this assessment. Again, this is a judgment call with no standard operating procedure, or manual, in place for guidance. Judgment calls often get made by BBB employees with no knowledge of the business’ policies, agreements, guarantees, return procedures or industry standards. It is not hard to imagine a swing in this arbitrary judgment process being greatly influenced by the BBB membership status of the business. “Resolved
Complaints” are good, at
least in the eyes of the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau, though not
necessarily in the eyes of the consumer. A
Resolved Complaint, as defined by the Los Angeles Better
Business
Bureau, is simply a complaint that a company has responded to the BBB
appropriately, as determined by the Los
Angeles Better Business Bureau. Here
are the appropriate responses a business may make:
As far as
the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau is concerned these are all the
same. In other words, all a business has
to do, especially if they are a LA BBB member business is stick to
their guns
and refuse to make an adjustment with the consumer based on any number
of
reasons, make sure they notify the LA BBB of their stance, and the LA
BBB will,
in almost all cases, treat it as a resolved complaint.
Once a complaint reaches Resolved Complaint
status it no longer counts against the company in its Letter Grade. Therefore, one business can have a substantial
history of complaints, yet receive an “A” grade from the LA BBB, while
another,
similar business can have less than a handful of complaints and receive
a “D or
an F” as the following example shows. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Nowhere on the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau website are complaint definitions or explanations available. This holds true on most other regional BBB websites as well as the national BBB website. This lack of transparency about what constitutes a complaint, how complaints are judged, and their impact on a business’ Letter Grade, are all reasons the BBB’s new Letter Grade system has proved unpopular with the media, the business community and over a third of the BBB regional offices themselves. There
is also
a cumulative effect a complaint has on a business’ Letter Grade,
similar to
compound interest. In addition to the
merits or demerits assigned to a complaints closure designation
(Unanswered,
Unresolved, Resolved) complaints are given further value judgments on
the
seriousness of the complaints, the total number of complaints and an
overall
analysis of a complaint. Thus,
a
single Unanswered Complaint can be counted against a business’ Letter
Grade
multiple times; negatively impacting the Unanswered Complaint, Serious
Complaint, Total Complaints and Complaint Analysis sections of the
algorithm. (We'll explore the LA BBB algorithm in
the next part of this series.) What is also clear is that as far as the consumer is concerned, the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau cares more about the lead generation value of your complaint than they do about resolving the complaint in your favor. |
|
| NEXT: THE BBB ALGORITHM
STILL DOESN'T ADD UP bbbroundup will investigate the real culprit behind the Letter Grade controversy -- the Los Angeles BBB algorithm. We will break down the algorithm and expose some of its shortcomings….and yes, we do have the actual BBB algorithm in our possession, it even says Patent Pending on it. More goofy grades too! |
|
![]() |
|
| Editor's note: Neither I or this website have a problem with the Better Business Bureau. Indeed, there is a need for a consumer advocacy group that the public can turn to, and in most cases, the Better Business Bureau fulfills this role adequately. What we do have a problem with is the BBB's "A-F" grading system. It is demonstratively biased, based on hearsay, weighted in favor of dues paying members and offers no recourse when the BBB makes an error. It is obvious the Better Business Bureau does not now, nor ever will have, the resources to fully investigate the four million businesses in their database, much less grade them with any sense of accuracy. It's an impossible job, and to think otherwise is a mistake that the BBB should acknowledge so they can get back to their reason for existence--protecting the consumer. There's an old saying, "who will watch the watchers" and it applies here as the BBB has set themselves up to be above the law. We are simply here to help the Better Business Bureau do a better job so that they may properly serve the consumer, the business community and themselves. | |
| ©
2009 bbbcentral.org. all rights reserved. |
Previous Articles
About the Better Business Bureau of the Southland, Inc. (LA BBB) background part one part two part three part four part five |