![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
AN INVESTIGATIVE NEWS SERIES ON THE STANDARDS AND PRACTICES OF THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU START WITH TRUTH |
|
V 1.1
April 2009 |
||
![]() |
||
PART SIX: LOS
ANGELES BBB ALGORITHM REVEALED
|
|
|
THE COMLETE
STORY ON THE BBB ALGORITHM IS HERE PAGE ONE OF LA BBB ALGORITHM PAGE TWO OF THE LA BBB
ALGORITHM
|
|
![]() |
|
| Editor's note: Neither I or this website have a problem with the Better Business Bureau. Indeed, there is a need for a consumer advocacy group that the public can turn to, and in most cases, the Better Business Bureau fulfills this role adequately. What we do have a problem with is the BBB's "A-F" grading system. It is demonstratively biased, based on hearsay, weighted in favor of dues paying members and offers no recourse when the BBB makes an error. It is obvious the Better Business Bureau does not now, nor ever will have, the resources to fully investigate the four million businesses in their database, much less grade them with any sense of accuracy. It's an impossible job, and to think otherwise is a mistake that the BBB should acknowledge so they can get back to their reason for existence--protecting the consumer. There's an old saying, "who will watch the watchers" and it applies here as the BBB has set themselves up to be above the law. We are simply here to help the Better Business Bureau do a better job so that they may properly serve the consumer, the business community and themselves. | |
| ©
2009 bbbcentral.org. all rights reserved. |
Previous Articles
About the Better Business Bureau of the Southland, Inc. (LA BBB) background part one part two part three part four part five part six part seven |