bbb roundup-an investigation of the Better Business Bureau
Lead story on the Better Business Bureau
Investigation of the Los Angeles Better Business Bureau
News Reports Clearing House of Filed Stories on the BBB
Side by Side Comparisons of Grades given by the BBB to like companies
BBB misconceptions and myths about the Better Business Bureau
bbb roundup grades the BBB using Better Business Bureaus Own Standards
Sign Our Petiton Against BBB
about bbb roundup
contact bbb roundup if you have a story or incident from interacting with the Better Business Bureau
Editorial and Op Ed pieces about the BBB



      AN INVESTIGATIVE NEWS SERIES
    ON THE STANDARDS AND PRACTICES   
    OF THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU

       
         START WITH TRUTH



  V 1.5  Nov 2010
SOME RECENT COMMENTS ABOUT THE BBB FROM ACROSS THE NATION
FROM WALLET POP

11-24-2010 @ 2:53PM

Jeff said...

People have been taking advantage of easy membership in BBB so they can use their logo on promotional literature for at least 25 years. The BBB seal of approval means nothing to anybody that understands how their organization can be played.

Reply

2 stars vote downvote upReport
Saturday17

11-27-2010 @ 3:30AM

Saturday said...

A large, well-known multi repair company operating in and around Houston, Texas displays their BBB seal for all to see. A representative of that dishonest company told us we needed a completely new central air conditioning unit. It turned out we only needed a new coil which was under warranty. When we began questioning the rep about the outrageous price and the necessity of the work, he couldn't get out of the house fast enough. A company of liars, cheaters sanctioned by the BBB. Why am I not surprised.

FROM SLATE

rick roget
This is something that is not unlike what occurred on Wall Street with Moody's and Morningstar handing AAA ratings to mortgage backed securities that flamed out. The busninesses and banks selling these instruments knew many of these securities were defective and played one rating agency off the other with no complaint from the rating agencies. Integrity of their stamp of approval was a secondary consideration.  
 
Anytime I see a rating on any financial instrument I am highly suspect and eventually can only conclude that I have to faith, which I classify as unverifiable vs trust which is verifiable.  
 
And this is why we needed a consumer protection agency--the so called watchdogs were being fed ribeyes by the people they were supposed to barking at.

Thursday, December 16, 2010, 3:06:53 PM
FlagReply
Melanie D
I had an issue with a franchise location of a national car repair/service chain. My complaint, which I opened with my area BBB, was transferred to the local BBB of the chain's headquarters. I was told that "this was how [chain name] required complaints against them to be handled because there are so many of them." Oh, really? This chain can boss the BBB around? The whole thing stunk to high heaven. Long story short, my complaint was never resolved to my satisfaction, in part because the chain did not respond to claims against franchisees, only the shops they directly owned. I have never trusted the BBB since.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 10:11:04 AM
FlagReply
Bert J. Miano
Unfortunately, my experience with BBB convinced me that they are more interested in protecting paying members than consumers. The proof to me is that companies with numerous complaints who have been found liable for fraud through BBB arbitration are still highly ranked. Why? Because they are paying, accredited members.  
 
Even if good, honest businesses can sometimes earn high rankings, the real fraud is that the BBB refuses to downgrade its accredited members even after they've been proving to cheat customers. That is indefensible in my opinion, and makes the BBB worthless to consumers.  
 
Check out my blog post on this topic: http://arockforeverygiant.blogspot.com/
Thursday, December 09, 2010, 2:52:42 PM
FlagReply
Kevin Bain
The BBB is a pay-to-play organization. Scentura is high-ranked in BBB listings, and they've been busted for fraud countless times. Same with a number of other scam companies.  
 
An ethical business doesn't need BBB standing to convince its customers that it's honest.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 7:30:52 PM
FlagReply
J. E. C.
Here's what we are being told here: do not trust the BBB. You can only trust the government to protect you.  
 
Frankly, I don't give a damn if the BBB discriminates against non-members. All I care is that they discriminate against shady businesses, and all evidence is that they do. In my own narrow experience, I found the BBB an invaluable resource in my years in the military, it being the best way to find a good local mechanic (or other service professional) quickly.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 3:37:12 PM
FlagReply
drgarnett
They shouldn't even be bothering to evaluate non-members, then. They are in essence telling people that BBB non-members are not as good as BBB members. That is worse than discrimination, it's misrepresentation.  
 
What you're really being told here is that you can't trust organizations that make you pay to play!
Saturday, December 11, 2010, 7:42:05 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
Matt Davis
Eric Greenspan
The BBB is a mess...I don't believe it started out this way, but its become an extortion tactic to get signups and fees. See my personal experience with the BBB here: http://www.ericgreenspan.com/me/better-business-bureau-for-who/
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 11:43:28 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
Tom Durkin
Kansas City BBB
In regards to the comments: Sometimes we will indeed tell people that there's nothing we can do. It not because we "take the company's side." These complaints mostly come from people who have signed contracts. If the consumer signs a really bad contract and gets taken advantage of, there's nothing we can do to stop it. They signed it. That's why we perpetually release tips, alerts, warnings, tweets, posts and blogs trying to get people not to do that. We work closely with consumer protection agencies and try to get these types of contracts banned or made illegal. That can happens through litigation that takes years.  
 
If an accredited business refuses to follow through on their end of a contract, we do the same thing to them and sometimes have to kick them out. Sometimes in the same day we get phone calls from businesses who say we "always" take the consumer's side and consumers claiming we "always" take the business's side.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 11:27:15 AM
FlagReply
Matt Davis
Thank you for showing some guts.
Saturday, December 11, 2010, 10:30:11 AM
FlagReply
Tom Wilson
I am a paying member and also on the BBB local board. I think generally they are good people with good intentions. The issue which I expounded on below is how they are organized. They have 160 fiefdom's throughout the U.S. with little centralized control. If you read all the comments below, some people report good results and others have the opposite to say. They (the BBB) has too many individuals making their own rules. My prediction is without a fundamental change, they will cease to exist. I mean who under 30 has any idea what the BBB is about? They know McAfee, VeriSign, Comodo, etc. but not the BBB.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 11:08:54 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
editcat
Samantha Rogers
Every young person I know knows what the BBB. Honestly until this article I thought it was a government organization, but I learned quite young that if a company tries to screw you over the BBB is always and option.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 10:13:44 PM
FlagReply
Justin Bowers
Isn't it funny how this situation is almost the same as the credit-rating agencies and mortgage-backed securities? You'd almost come to the conclusion that doing business with firms over which you're supposed to provide oversight is not the best of ideas, especially for consumers.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 10:30:50 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
steveh46
finkyboy
editcat
Cindy Proctor
The BBB now supports the business and not the consumer as I have had first-hand experience. They sided with the business who lied through their teeth. It was a total waste of time to pursue anything with them. Apparently, businesses are now buying into BBB and they support them, rather than the consumer.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 10:12:12 AM
FlagReply
Tom Wilson
A FISH STINKS FROM THE HEAD  
 
By way of background I am a business executive, entrepreneur, consumer advocate, author and on the BBB local board.  
 
Since 2007, we conducted research with our customers (coast to coast) to help us better understand the effect the BBB logo has as a purchase motivator. Results of this study were forwarded to key leadership within the local and national BBB organization.  
We also prepared and forwarded a competitive analysis of the online “trust” business with recommendations for better defining the business the BBB is in - the "trust" business. This too was shared with local and national leadership.  
 
The 20/20 expose was certainly a major setback for the BBB brand, but it is only symptomatic of the BBB’s current command and control structure.  
 
Think about BBB as a brand with brand equity (like Tide detergent). A closer to home example would be McAfee, VeriSign, Comodo, etc. Think about what comes to mind to the average consumer when they hear or see "BBB". The truth is not much.  
 
Following is what is urgently needed to keep the BBB brand relevant. Otherwise, I'm confident that over time the brand will cease to exist. My recommendations are much broader than what Steve Cox is implementing. That is why I am writing to you and the board.  
 
• The #1 opportunity for the BBB brand is changing the organizational structure and creating a centralized command and control structure.  
 
• The #2 opportunity is reorganizing as a for profit as a stock company. The BBB is not organized to compete effectively in today's marketplace. A sale of the brand to a competitor should be considered (VeriSign, McAfee, etc.).  
 
• Significantly downsize the organization (offices/people). Having 160 offices with multiple President/CEO’s is inefficient and impractical. I’m sure none of the local leaders would agree.  
 
• Employ a qualified compensation expert like Hay Associates and overhaul the current compensation system. The current system would not work in a "for profit organization". Compensation equity and levels are a major issue in the current structure.  
 
• Hire a highly experienced branding or positioning consultant to define the business the BBB is in (the trust business) and how to properly position it for today's marketplace.  
 
The BBB brand needs to compete against a plethora of newer trust brands such as VeriSign, McAfee, Comodo and customer review sites such as a Trip Advisor, GetHuman, and others.  
 
These recommendations focus on the core organization and brand issues. Simply making adjustments to how the BBB implements a rating system across 160 decentralized offices is a tactical move and similar to rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic.  
 
I feel that Steve Cox is simply not up to the task of leading the BBB under its current structure, let alone attempting to lead it into the future.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 10:07:30 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
rick roget
Moonbat
Those jackasses have called me repeatedly demanding money for a listing. Whatever their official position when their executives are talking to Congress, the line taken by their sales reps clearly links rating to membership. (For example: "You need a membership because otherwise you won't be able to defend yourself from malicious accusations that would lower your rating.")  
 
The best thing I can say about the BBB is that it's light years less corrupt than Dun & Bradstreet, who have also called me, but D&B had the unmitigated gall to tell me that they were KNOWINGLY publishing INACCURATE information, but would only correct it if I paid them $400. D&B is nothing but a protection racket. The BBB is merely useless, which is much better.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 10:03:12 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
steveh46
Tom Durkin
Jesse
Just last week I got an email from an obvious spammer offering me the privilege of buying a domain name that was similar to another that I own for 50 times the price it would normally cost if the spammer didn't have a temporary hold on it.  
 
I googled this guy and among a dozen blog entries exposing the spammer as a fraud, there was the result giving his BBB rating: an A-. He must be a member.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 9:04:12 AM
FlagReply
Samantha Rogers
If you pay him does he give you the product you paid for? If so, then he isn't a fraud he's just holding a scarce commodity (that paticular domain name).
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 10:16:30 PM
FlagReply
Citizen ++
Local BBBs can be helpful to consumers, but the National BBB has become the worst of the worst special interests in Congress fighting for corporate tax breaks, big oil, and union busting that is destroying the middle class and working families.  
 
High rollers with some of their own questionable human rights history including Apple, Nike, and Toyota have left the national BBB because its been getting so bad.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 8:29:04 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
Lawrence Godsey
janes_kid
I had always just assumed that [T]he Better Business Bureau a protection racket since I first tried to get some assistance from them in, perhaps, 1968. Am I a prophet or has it always been this way?
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 8:10:26 AM
FlagReply
Mitbert Strangejoy
If you've been defrauded, you'd probably do much better writing to the FTC and your state AG than to the BBB. If your state AG is a Democrat, they're likely to be your best bet. I'm not trying to be partisan here, but consumer protection suits from state AGs are almost entirely brought by Democrats.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 7:00:27 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
janes_kid
John Kennel
Bill Collins
The BBB is a racket. I have twice tried to use them in complaints against companies and in both instances their stock answer was "the company has met our guidelines and we consider the matter satisfactorily closed." No amount of letter writing or telephoning will get the BBB to move off that position. I told the local BBB manager that if he was putting the interests of the dues payers over the public and essentially lying about what service they perform. That was in 2007. Nothing has changed.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 6:28:36 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
Shannon Adolph
Melanie D
Same thing happened to me. Plus they transferred my complaint to the local BBB of the national headquarters of the company in question, which was totally sketchy.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 10:14:30 AM
FlagReply
karl
I was able to resolve service issues with two companies through complaints with the BBB. In both cases, the companies were unresponsive until the complaints were filed. Then both resolved the issues to my satisfaction. Based on these experiences, I stand by the BBB and the consumer protections they provide.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 6:06:53 AM
FlagReply
Melody
The only thing the BBB is good for is threatening fraudulent companies with.  
They don't know that nothing would happen.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 5:47:17 AM
FlagReply
Liked by
Lawrence Godsey
faxmebeer
The only people I have ever heard mention the BBB are complainers; I have never heard from a customer who said they chose us because of BBB research. When a complainer tells me the are calling the BBB, I could honestly not care less, since they are only going to talk to other whiners who don't bother to understand what they are buying before they do buusiness. We need a better consumer beureau, to tell the truth.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010, 3:52:04 AM
FlagReply
Bowl Weevils
The BBB was useless to me. They couldn't even get Uverse to address my concerns in writing when I told them that one of my concerns was that Uverse's representatives provide inaccurate information over the phone, and because I was on painkillers and did not want to engage in phone negotiations with a professional negotiator while not in peak mental condition. Uverse just kept refusing to respond in writing and telling me to call them. BBB kept saying "sorry we can't achieve a resolution". As far as I can tell, I don't think anyone at the BBB even looked at the complaint.
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 5:55:08 PM
FlagReply

daedalus
Say what you want about the BBB, but if you have a problem with a company, a complaint to the BBB really gets things done. I have been astonished at how quickly a company will respond with apologies and solutions after a complaint to the BBB-- even after repeated complaints directly to the company were completely ignored.  
 
And then the BBB will follow up with you to make sure it was properly handled. The grading system sounds suspect, but the way they advocate on behalf of consumers is top notch.
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 5:36:47 PM
FlagReply
Julia
Now I haven't seen this happen. I've filed numerous complaints and basically been told to "solve it myself".  
 
Or have gotten "arbitration" that automatically sides with the company in question. (Such as, "I bought X from you that broke instantly. I tried to take it back, couldn't. I complained. BBB said they'd arbitrate. The arbitrator said 'obviously you broke it, and are causing problems'.") Seriously. I'd 100% agree that BBB is a protection racket and that you really can't trust their ratings as far as you can throw them.
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 5:49:49 PM
FlagReply
daedalus
Weird. Maybe the regional offices are different? I've used the BBB in my city and always had great results.
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 5:56:10 PM
FlagReply
John Kennel
Well, obviously it would vary from city to city (and from case to case), since each office appears to be operated more or less independently.
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 8:00:50 PM
FlagReply
Sahel Chen
I agree. I have been fighting with Tmobile for more than a year over their crappy service. I finally broke down and wrote the bbb a letter 2 weeks ago. I got a response two days ago, informing me that Tmobile was letting me out of my contract (without a fee).
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 11:48:52 PM
FlagReply
Nexus7
> Too bad the BBB can't lay down a couple hundred to buy membership in ABC News, the L.A. Times, or the Connecticut attorney general's office.  
 
Wait a sec now. They can get a pretty good plug on Fox for a few of their morals and 2 quid.
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 5:32:39 PM
FlagReply
Liked by
Jeremy R. Hoyt
Lawrence Godsey

BBB has contacted me many times to join ( for a hefty fee of course) and when I questioned the person on the phone about irregularities in the news about the rating system, she said a supervisor would call me ( guess what not one call again) no follow up to join–guess that’s one way to stop the harassing phone calls to join BBB

mentman says:

Good article George,
Deserves an A+ by BBB… kidding ;)
I remember reading about Blumenthal and his showboating when he sued the Southridge Capital a couple of months ago right before the elections…

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by George Gombossy, Katrina Britt and others. Katrina Britt said: Blumenthal's BBB Investigation: Made For TV | Connecticut Watchdog: In late September ABC TV's 20/20 began inves… http://bit.ly/feojYp [...]

George Gombossy says:

I loved your story on BBB.
I’m writing you about a company called American Foods that I worked at some 40 plus years ago. I know that they went bankrupt in the 90′s at least that’s what I was told verbally from a third party after I sent a letter to them in regards to my retirement account that they held in a separate account for profit sharing. American never responded to me at all.  I see from a BBB search, that BBB gives them an A+.
BBB also states that they incorporated in 1961 and started there business in 1921.  Nothing is ever mentioned about bankruptcy.

I also see that Mister Bill Rappoport is the principle.  Bill is the son of Norman Rappoport who was on the Board of directors at BBB years ago. Is their anything shady going on here?

They seem to being D/B/A American Foods but BBB reports them as American Frozen Foods Inc. which was the name when I worked for them.  I’m just trying to get the monies that they held in the 80′s and were paying about 13% at that time.  I wrote them in the 80′s and was told I would receive the funds 1 year after I left then I was told that I had to wait till I was 55 and here I am at 59 years old with no funds yet.

Interesting how they get an A+ from BBB.
http://www.bbb.org/connecticut/business-reviews/food-plans/american-frozen-foods-in-milford-ct-32000323


Can you help in this matter or direct me?
Thank you
Peter

  1. Just sayin says:

    It’s ok George. Those of us in CT for any length of time, know that Blumenthal is nothing but a media whore constantly seeking the camera! We know how he “investigates”. YOU keep up the good work. He’ll be GONE from here VERY soon!

    • thinkstoomuch says:

      Thanks CT Voters! You got rid of the media whore by sending him to America’s County Club (The Senate). Now he can grandstand and torment the whole country. I would have rather seen McMann or Schiff over this admitted prevaricator.

      Between you guys and the voters in Alaska we really do have the government we deserve.

ABC NEWS

I take it this scumbag won't be getting any unemployment benefits? LOL After all, he wasn't fired. And the only reason he quit is apparently so he won't have to face the music.
 
I wish to thank ABC News for performing a terrific job in exposing the fraud scam on American citizens. The Los Angeles' Better Business Bureat should now face a harsh lawsuit for scamming American people for the money. The Better Business is nothing but a crook!
 
I'ed like to thank,and compliment ABC for doing a wonderful job in in exposing the fraud scamed on American people.A message to my fellow Americans,if it sounds to good to be true,it usually is.Especially when they're asking for money to be wired to a western union.
 
Prime example of corruption,within our system,and the question we all have to ask ourselves. People like Bill Mitchell,and others like him who are still out there committing such acts need's to be held accountable for their acts of greed,and abuse of authority intrusted in them.These are probably the people like Bill Mitchell who is trying to find a way how to indict Julian Assange merely because of the corruption within our own system.As of now,in our name of as Americans,they're trying to manuplate Bradley Manning to cover up their deception to us the American people.They're edging on our( FIRST AMENDENT RIGHTS) freedom of the press............
 
It all makes sense now. I used the BBB to research a company before I got involved with them, and got screwed anyway.
 
The BBB is and always has been a shakedown scheme.
 
Crooks can figure around anything. That's what makes them crooks.
 
The BBB gets an FFF.
 
What this criminal did has destroyed the reputation of the BBB for all time. He should be serving time for his crimes and be given the maximum sentence possible.
 
Ahhh a scammer ! Bet he likes GOP agenda ( i.e. look the other way as long as somebody is raking in profits some way / any way , never mind the smell....) Ya just gotta love that GOP "Moral Majority " ethic....
 



Editor's note:  There is a need for a consumer advocacy group that the public can turn to, and it used to be that the Better Business Bureau fulfilled this role adequately.  No longer.  It is obvious the Better Business Bureau does not now, nor ever will have, the resources to fully investigate the four million businesses in their database, much less grade them with any sense of accuracy.  It's an impossible job, and to think otherwise is a mistake that the BBB should acknowledge so they can get back to their reason for existence--protecting the consumer.  There's an old saying, "who will watch the watchers" and it applies here as the BBB has set themselves up to be above the law.  We are simply here to help the Better Business Bureau do a better job so that they may properly serve the consumer, the business community and themselves.  If they refuse to reform, then they must bear the consequences.
© 2009-2010 bbbroundup.com.  all rights reserved.
Previous Lead Stories
february 2009   april 2009  may 2009  july 2009  august 2009  january 2010